A team of Australian scholars allegedly refuted the E-Cat test results
He is about to end up run over, his mother saves himE-Cat, cold fusion Rossi is still discussing. FromAustralia we talk about it in rather heavy terms. To point the finger at the catalyst were the researchers of the Australian Skeptics Society who would have refuted the results of the di Rossi made last year.
Il carry-over dell 'Australian Skeptics Society, a non-profit association that studies paranormal phenomena and pseudoscienceand through the scientific method, it would therefore deny that the results obtained in the March tests are reliable and above all correct.
But let's try to clarify the matter better. As we have explained several times, the energy miracle connected to cold fusion lies in the fact that a large amount of energy is required to "push" the atomic nuclei to the merger. And it is not easy, given the very strong resistance. In fact, inside the nuclei there are protons and neutrons bound together by nuclear forces. And the only way to produce energy is to provide even more energy. And this, as can be easily understood, would make the final balance almost zero if not negative.
But Rossi, with theE-Cat, would have been able to overturn this balance, producing a greater quantity of energy than that introduced. According to the astralians, several scientists from all over the world have confirmed this possibility, conquered by theE-Cat, after having witnessed a demonstration or analysis of the results.
Australian skeptics, however, are not so convinced. According to them, in fact, the output power was only apparently greater than the initial input, because at the base there would be a error. According to what he claims Dick Smith, leader of the Australian skeptics “it would be nice if that were true, but it is more likely that it was just one incorrect connection of the power cable. "
So sent the aerospace engineer Ian Bryce part of the group, at an investor meeting on the NSW North Coast on January 13 to investigate the matter.
Bryce would have found that in all six tests published up to July, a ground wire was disconnected and that fact could have caused errors, bypassing the power meters. And even in all subsequent tests there was no valid measurement of power due to poorly positioned meters.
At this point, Smith asks for clarification: "It is now up to Mr. Rossi to redo the experiments of March 2011 also in the presence of an 'independent person' who actually measures the current in each of the wires of the three power cables."
Smith continues: "If one of the wires was accidentally disconnected, the actual current measurements would not be equivalent to the total power of the reactor, and there would be an apparent power gain."
Far from buying a catalyst, Smith urges shoppers to keep their eyes peeled and a be wary of the E-Cat until this situation is clarified: "Until the possibility of this accidentally wrong relationship is proven wrong by further proof, I strongly recommend the public not to buy this machine or invest in this technology".
Storm coming for Rossi or an attempt to boycott the E-Cat?
Francesca Mancuso
Read all our articles on the E-cat
