A very little coveted title the one with which the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals association awarded the singer Janet Jackson and the worldly Kim Kardashian. It is the “Celebrity Awards Grinch”, an all-negative award (a sort of local tapir) awarded to those who have strongly threatened, with their choices in terms of fashion, the welfare of animals more than any other celebrity. To those who, just like the Grinch, spoil the holidays with their disaffection for other living beings.
He is about to end up run over, his mother saves him
A very little coveted title the one with which the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals association awarded the singer Janet Jackson and the worldly Kim Kardashian. And the "Celebrity Awards Grinch”, A totally negative award (a sort of local“ tapir ”) awarded to those who have strongly threatened, with their choices in terms of fashion, the welfare of animals more than any other celebrity. To whom, just like the Grinch, ruins the holidays with their lack of love for other living beings.
According to Peta, the most animal-unfriendly celebrity would be Janet. Michael's sister managed to outdo even Kim Kardashian, who, while continuing to be immortalized by the paparazzi with skins and furs in his outfits, slips to third place, after director Cameron Crowe. Criticized for her collaboration with Blackglama, a brand that advertises garments made with "the best mink in the world," Jackson is teased on Peta's blog, which recalls her 2004 performance with Justin Timberlake, when she was discovered a otherwise. "During the wretched 'wardrobe malfunction' - Peta writes - during the Super Bowl, at least the meat in sight was his, unlike the stolen animal skins he covers himself with, which died as his taste for fashion (not to mention his career) ".
To Jackson, who in the brand's advertising campaign appears smiling wearing a mink coat, Peta's vice president, Dan Matthews, also wrote a letter: "You told me you didn't like it when, in photo shoots, stylists tried to make yourself wear a fur coat and that you were reluctant to even wear a fake fur because you were afraid it would look real in the picture and send the wrong message. You were clear and sensitive about it. What happened now? ”.
Thumbs down also for director Cameron Crowe, who in the film “We bought a zoo” would have exploited animals instead of reconstructing the scenes on the computer, and for Kardashian. The star of American reality shows is attacked starting from her very short marriage, which lasted only 72 days, with basketball player Kris Humphries: "Kim just can't get a divorce from fur and say 'yes' to a more compassionate wardrobe". But the protagonist of "Keeping Up with the Kardashians" had actually already ended up in the crosshairs of the animal rights association as the Worst Dressed Woman of 2010. An entire campaign was also dedicated to her. poster with a picture of two fox cubs and a question: “Kim, these two cubs miss their mother. Is it her that you carry on your shoulders? ".
La Peta explains on his website that he did everything to put an end to this abominable love for fur: "we contacted Kim several times to talk to her about the cruelty of the fur industry, she knows that animals on farms are kept in small cages exposed to the elements , who are electrocuted and often skinned alive ". By putting its cruel fashion choices on display, the association hopes to force the celeb to make a change, so that even the thousands of people who follow it are more motivated to shop "cruelty free". And to say that, ironically, her younger sister Khloe was, like Elisabetta Canalis, one of the testimonials of the “I'd rather go naked than wear fur” campaign, “better naked than in fur”. Let's see if Kim and Janet will give up their furs too.
Roberta Ragni
